[BUG] Download after / incrementally does NOT currently apply to messages?! #106

Closed
opened 2025-12-16 13:18:08 +00:00 by RedDwarf · 2 comments

Hi,

the settings for incremental downloading after a given date do not currently apply, when downloading messages/paid messages, it seems!? (scraping and (logically following) downloading should stop, when it has reached older messages than the date given in the config, IMHO!?)

Hi, the settings for incremental downloading after a given date do not currently apply, when downloading messages/paid messages, it seems!? (scraping and (logically following) downloading should stop, when it has reached older messages than the date given in the config, IMHO!?)
melithine added the
invalid
label 2025-12-16 13:55:31 +00:00
Collaborator

It's not supported by the OF API for messages, only posts. That is why https://docs.ofdl.tools/config/all-configuration-options/#downloadonlyspecificdates specifically mentions posts.

It's not supported by the OF API for messages, only posts. That is why https://docs.ofdl.tools/config/all-configuration-options/#downloadonlyspecificdates specifically mentions posts.
Author

It's not supported by the OF API for messages, only posts. That is why https://docs.ofdl.tools/config/all-configuration-options/#downloadonlyspecificdates specifically mentions posts.

Hmm, but OF-DL does get the message timestamps when downloading them, and at least for "after" "specific date" cases, the program could stop, when the last message downloaded is older than that date stamp? 🙊 (since it does start with the newest message...) (just thinking about this, from a code/computer science point of view...)

> It's not supported by the OF API for messages, only posts. That is why https://docs.ofdl.tools/config/all-configuration-options/#downloadonlyspecificdates specifically mentions posts. Hmm, but OF-DL does get the message timestamps when downloading them, and at least for "after" "specific date" cases, the program could stop, when the last message downloaded is older than that date stamp? 🙊 (since it does start with the newest message...) (just thinking about this, from a code/computer science point of view...)
Sign in to join this conversation.
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: sim0n00ps/OF-DL#106
No description provided.